Field And Frame
The thought went something like this: I noticed that the images I liked most had in common a field condition. And when I tried to decide what that was, I came up with the following technical checklist:
-repetition in multiple dimensions
-irregular or elusive pattern
-seems to register other forces
-brings together distinct elements but keeps them separate
-relationships between distinct elements give rise to an overall impression
-resembles in some way an actual field
A Gee’s Bend quilt, a Manny Farber painting, an ambient album cover, a New Perennial planting: they all had these things in common. And when I looked at them, I would read into the composition ideals that may or may not have been intended: democracy, or thrift, or realism, or really just the ideal behind all of those that for some reason I cherish the most, that all things are basically equal in importance, and if you only saw them that way something mystical would happen.
So once again, I brought in the first-year graduate students in our program to help me investigate. I reasoned to them: to make such field conditions work in four-dimensional space, we would have to be careful in framing our dimensions. Too small, and there would be no field; too large, and the field would only overwhelm. Framed poorly, the field would be exclusive, one more random object among other random objects; framed well, the field would invite in others, people or birds or swallowtails, to join it. If the field could be perceived as a meaningful pattern from a window, from the air, from a sidewalk, it would encourage them to cross that frame, collapsing the difference between outside and inside.
Now, if you are thinking that what is good to one person in two dimensions might not transfer cleanly to what is good for the community in four dimensions – or that the whole concept seems a little abstract for students who are still learning how to draw, plant, and grade landscapes – at this point, I am inclined to agree with you. And as much as I would like to put the aesthetic in front of the social and the environmental, you can see why time demands that it be left to instinct and imitation, in this of all disciplines. But it is an ill wind etc., etc., and you can see here a selection of some of the great deeds they did.